Wednesday, April 3, 2019
Growth and expansion of Arcelik Home Appliances
Growth and magnification of Arcelik Home AppliancesIntroductionArcelik Home Appliances is the leading(p) manufacturer of home appliances in joker with a trade voice of 50% in the house servant market as at 2003 (Ghemawat, 2008). It supplies the market using twain brands namely Arcelik and Beko. The bon ton has transfer an international expansion strategy and has already been selling its products to more(prenominal) than one hundred (100) countries mainly in Western europium, eastern atomic number 63, Latin America, Asia, and North Africa (Ghemawat, 2008). Arcelik was originally founded to begin metallic office article of furniture in 1955 but diversified into issue of household appliances shortly after. It has been hailed as the first club to introduce appliances much(prenominal) as washing machines and refrigerators to the Turkish households. Arcelik would face further altercates when it became apparent that the Turkish government would be combat-ready in the Eur opean Communitys tariff reduction which was meant to reduce to zero from 1992 to 1996 (Ghemawat, 2008). The challenge would be controversy from another(prenominal) manufactures from the European Community who would be qualified to sell their products at more competitive process in the house servant market. Arcelik overcame this challenge by investing heavily in research and teaching thereby substantially astir(p) the gauge of their products. The comp any(prenominal) is currently the leading holder of patents in the Turkish market. This strategy cemented its market leadership in the municipal market as consumers preferred to spend a superficial more to obtain goods whose durability could be assured. This preference was withal heighten by Turkeys fluctuating market where inflationary forces were highly unpredict sufficient with the greater odds being to the consumers disadvantage. Arcelik would later grow to establish its market authorization in Turkey for decades but wou ld later face challenges that would trigger its centralize on international expansion to go over its survival and ripening.Arceliks motives for international expansionThe focus on international expansion by Arcelik was triggered by the sparing crisis that hit Turkey in 2001. This crisis had led to soaring levels of unemployment and a epochal reduction of market train by an estimated figure of 35% (Ghemawat, 2008). This strategy mainly comprised increasing exports as well as pleasant in international acquisitions. The stinting crisis in Turkey must have turn up to Arcelik the vulnerability of firms wholly dependent on house servant markets. Pressures from business cycles, inflation, affair rates, exchange rates and political forces are prevalent in domestic markets. On the other hand, international markets tend to be better insulated from much(prenominal) pressures since they will rarely apply across several countries. Economic crisis in one market would normally not be pr evalent in the rest of the markets hence multinationals hobo ensure stability by market their products across legion(predicate) countries. Arcelik had to get a way to survive the economic crisis in 2001 and as well ensure that future company doing was stabilized by reducing its level of vulnerability to domestic market fluctuations. Arcelik too seek to focus on international expansion in order to make up its level of production and increase its economies of dental plate (Ghemawat, 2008). This actor that with additional production, the apostrophize of producing each unit product becomes signifi corporationtly decline hence catering a company to make higher margins per unit or allowing them to charge lower per unit without incurring any losses. Economies of scale allow a company to remain competitive in the ever-evolving economies. To ensure that the economies of scale do not end up in accumulation of deadened stock, or in the escalation of warehousing and warehousing co st, Arcelik would need to look to markets that would be able to support its intention of increasing the economies of scale through with(predicate) and through a larger demand. The national demand within Turkey would not be able to absorb these additional products hence the rationale behind Turkey looking to expand international trade. The level of demand for home appliances in Europe alone is about 25% of world demand (Ghemawat, 2008). Arcelic sought to tap into this huge demand to support its competitiveness and the large levels of production occasioned by their strategy of maximizing on the economies of scale. International expansion piece of tail in addition be explored where a company seeks to lower its production cost by having a signifi tailt proportion of their production done from regions where the cost is lower than in the domestic market. cardinal of the major factors of production that normally influence the decision of afield production is labour. When considering l abour, it is imperative that a company weighs between the benefits of the savings from paying the lower labour cost, the differences in the productivity of the workers between the higher wage and lower wage areas, and the transport and storage cost implications. It is excessively worth noting that in many cases, where the labour costs are low, other factors of production such as land would also be relatively lower. The labour cost in Western Europe is estimated to be five times that in Turkey. Labor cost in Turkey is three times that in east Europe (Ghemawat, 2008). In China, it is four times lower than in Turkey. Labor productivity also varies and must be taken into account. For instance, in China, labour productivity is precisely half of that in Turkey. Additional transportation costs are determined by both the distance between the production facilities and the levelheaded environments of the countries through which the products must cross to get to its intended markets. Acc ess to international markets is life-or-death to any nerve that seeks to expand itself. Domestic markets will a great deal in many cases be found insufficient to support the offset targets that the companies hardening for themselves. They are also in many cases unable to modify an organization to recoup the investments they whitethorn make in research and development in time. The complexity and the level of innovations in the global market is advanced and often leads to production of new and better fulfilling products. This signifi throw outtly reduces the product life cycles and the companies move in research and development need to gain assurance that their investments can be recouped before the products lose demand. This assurance can only be found by marketing extensively in the international markets where the demand is much larger and can ably support the level of gross gross revenue needed. Arcelik was motivated to focus on international markets since it had opted to mark itself as a research and development specialist who focused on the production of quality and durable products. These features would mean that it would need to charge relatively higher prices for the products. On the other side, the products from other European countries were finding their way into Turkey receivable to the zero tariff ar throw awayment with the European countries. The first appearance of other products in Turkey meant that Arcelik would either have to lower their prices in order to admit its domestic grapple market, or expand its operations to European and other markets in order to maintain or increase its level of sales to clients that focus more on quality, suitability and durability of the products they purchase.Arceliks options for expansionIn order to realize its goal of expansion into the international markets, Arcelik has adopted a number of options to help them realize this goal. The international market entry options adopted by Arcelik include use of exports, international acquisitions, use of private cross out contracting, and product diversification.Organic domestic growth and use of exportsArcelik ensured growth domestically by ensuring reliable accessibility to the market using exclusive distributors and agencies who also served as centres for offering after sales services. This exclusive network also served as an entry barrier for any new market operators. merchandise entails maintaining the companys operations in the home market and selling the products in overseas markets (Giroud, Sinkovics, and Yamin, 2011). It is hailed as the least costly elan of contrary market entry but at the same time the most vulnerable to unlike entry barriers as government regulations. The cost effectiveness of this entry order is enhanced by the fact that it requires no invitement with the contrasted governments or the companies in operation(p) in the target market. It is often seen as the best trend of entry for an organization ope rating on a lower scale. With accompanying growth of exports, the company may open sales agencies in the foreign markets to be the link with the companys clients overseas. By 2003, Arcelik had grown to be the leading actor in Estonia and Lithuania with a market share of 25% in these two markets. It also had a commanding presence in the rest of Eastern Europe. The presence of Arceliks sales agencies helped grow significantly in Western Europe with a markets share of 15% in the United Kingdom. Arcelik also conducted a winnerful export strategy gaining a 70% market share in Romania with its Beko brand. The net effect of these exporting strategies was a significant increase in Arcetiks production capacity from 440,000 to 750,000 in 2003 and 2004 respectively (Ghemawat, 2008).International acquisitionsThis mode involves a company buying out another firm operating in the target market hence assuming full phase of the moon legal rights over it. This regularity is hailed as the best mo de of expansion into other markets since it grants a company total control over the foreign footslogger as well as full realises generated thereafter (Giroud, Sinkovics, and Yamin, 2011). The full control over the activities of a subsidiary is viewed as essential in ensuring they run in accordance with the philosophies of the parent company hence ensure the goals of the company are achieved as intended. The targets for acquisition would need to have the for sure ability to complement Arceliks growth strategies. Arcelik would also evaluate the foreign firms brands and take consideration on how these brands would help strengthen them as well as complement their capabilities. The target subsidiarys contribution to sustainable growth was also a key factor. Arceliks acquisitions in 2002 include Bloomberg, Electra, and Flavel and Leisure in Germany, Austria and the UK for the two last mentioned brands (Ghemawat, 2008). They also acquired Arctic in Romania. The acquisitions of brands i n the target markets was seeming aware by the fact that many consumers tend to prefer purchasing brands that they can identify with the brands they consider national brands. These acquisitions tremendously increased the product range offered by Arcelik and lead to its significant growth within the European markets. hire of license contractingLicensing involves the company transferring legitimate rights to another firm to enable it manufacture products using its brand. In licensing, the consideration that the licensor gets is only the royalty or the license fee (Giroud, Sinkovics, and Yamin, 2011). It does not take part in profit sharing or any other marketing processes of the licensee. Licensing offers the advantage of modify a firm to avoid government regulations and other restrictive policies such as tariffs and quotas. It also enables market penetration without involving extensive uppercase expenditures. However, this method is highly restrictive in the level of control the company can have over the activities of the licensee. There is also the risk of the licensee gaining the technical expertise and becoming a competitor in the production of close substitutes after the expiry of the mutual arrangement. Arceliks production in 2004 comprised 40% from discordant licensing arrangements (Ghemawat, 2008). This praiseful effort helped ensure Arceliks brand presence in the Europeans markets.Diversification into other businesses within TurkeyIn order to enhance further growth in the domestic market, Arcelik sought to capitalize on its elaborate distribution network to provide consumers with additional products. By 2004, Arcelik was offered various types cellular phones and was already getting into arrangement with various Japanese firms to act as distributors of various electronic products. The diversification proved to be a great success and further cemented Arceliks leadership in the Turkish market.Additional Options for ExpansionArceliks aspirant goal of achieving revenues of three billion Euros in the next year may be difficult to realize unless additional methods were employed to ensure its move growth in the international markets. Domestically, Arcelik could opt to but out topical anesthetic competitors in a bid to solidify its hold on the local anesthetic market. This solidification would help reduce the downward pressure on its product prices by reducing the significance of competition locally. In addition, the additional conduct of distribution gained through any such acquisition would act as an entry barrier to any foreign firms hence ensuring steady domestic growth. Internationally, Arcelik could embrace a number of methods to ensure its continue growth. These methods include engaging in Joint ventures, franchising and use of strategicalal alliances.Joint VenturesJoint ventures involve the formation of a colleagueship arrangement with a different company where the parent companies provide the resources to operate i t, share responsibility on management, and share profits recognise thereafter (Giroud, Sinkovics, and Yamin, 2011). This type of venture is especially normal where it comes to sharing the intelligence and technical knowhow required for research and development. With their determination to distinguish themselves as the masters of innovation and product development, this method can be used to ensure its rapid growth. Instead of engaging in competition with the already existing companies in the foreign market, Arcelik could identify a strategic partner who knows the market remarkably well. They could then research into the market needs in a bid to try and unveil any unsatisfied demands in the market. Having found the features lacking in the products found in the market, they could, through the joint venture develop new products that would suit this need and root out the unreached market. This method would be convenient to Arcelik since it would not involve many unnecessary govern ment regulations that normally bar entry. In addition, such a venture, if well implemented would intimately capture the market as it would be riding on the goodwill and distribution network of the strategic partner in the foreign market.FranchisingArcelik needs to consider franchising in order to smirch the risks involved with the licensing as it currently practices. Here, Arcelik would transfer whatever rights to the franchisee to produce the products at a lower place its brand but will reserve the right to provide some aspects of technical support (Giroud, Sinkovics, and Yamin, 2011). This way, Arcelik will be able to be informed with the activities of the franchisee. In addition, in Franchising, the royalty is based on the amount of sales hence Arcelik will be able to generate higher revenues in the event the franchisor is able to realize significantly higher sales. Franchising is easy to start since the franchisor incurs minimal capital cost hence Arcelik can expand into mo re foreign markets with relative ease. Moreover, the franchisee assumes all the risks and foots for all costs of labour and deftness establishment. The company will also be able to avoid any political risks associated with foreigners operating in national markets. Arcelik can and then easily expand its scale of production without worrying about high capital expenditure hence edging closer to achieving the revenue targetsStrategic alliancesA strategic alliance differs from joint ventures in that it does not necessarily involve formation of a legal entity. Strategic alliances are formed to enable companies use each others distribution networks, technologies, production capacities, management experience and others (Giroud, Sinkovics, and Yamin, 2011). One very essential factor in ensuring product penetration in the market is the distribution network. This has been apparent in the manner in which Arcelik has been able to capture the domestic market by using effective distribution net works in Turkey. Arcelik should also try to replicate this experience in the foreign markets. However, by virtue of the fact that its a foreign market, they may not have the resources to establish an effective distribution network in those markets. It would therefore be relatively more convenient to identify foreign companies with a distribution network that serves their target customers effectively, and then enter into a strategic alliance with them. This may be companies offering similar products or those qualification completely different products. When the products are easily available to the consumers, they more likely to buy these products and this would lead to an increase in the amount of sales realized by Arcelik. The strategic alliance could also involve sharing of genuine technologies between the companies in question. Arcelik could choose to leave the production of a certain product components to a company with a comparative advantage in its production in exchange for providing a component which it can produce more efficiently. This exchange could lead to lowering the production cost which would be useful in helping the company become more price-competitive in the market.ConclusionArceliks growth is mainly dependent on how the company can enter and prosper in the international markets. This is because it is already commanding the domestic market in Turkey and may have limited growth opportunities locally. Growth and diversification are often related as is evident from Arceliks company history. Arcelik has grown in the past by steadily improving on the product range that it offers to the market and this diversification should be continued to ensure continued growth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.